Is it any good out there?
1:44 · iPhone
Camden's sheet in the weather map: the raw METAR with a plain-English decode, the TAF as a timeline, and a runway wind analysis for each forecast period. NOTAMs show as not checked because no NAIPS login is connected in the clip.
Transcript
- Late Sunday afternoon at Camden. Time for a few circuits before last light? First question: is it any good out there?
- Pull up Camden's sheet. Near the top: NOTAMs not checked. They come through your own NAIPS login, and none is connected here.
- Raw METAR, as issued: Camden's automatic station at 06:30 Zulu. Wind 150 at 11, visibility 10 kilometres or more, no cloud detected, QNH 1021.
- Plain English underneath says the same in words. A fixed set of rules decodes it, not a language model.
- The Forecast tab lays the TAF out as a timeline. Amended at 05:10 Zulu, valid to 18 Zulu, and VFR all the way along.
- The line across the top comes from the TAF too: moderate turbulence below 5,000 feet, until 14 Zulu. That's where the circuit is.
- The period we're in, 05 to 08 Zulu: 160 at 14, CAVOK.
- Each period has a runway analysis. METAR and TAF wind is in degrees true, and runways are numbered magnetic, so it converts the wind first.
- Runway 10 is the pick: 9 knots on the nose, 10 across from the right. Runway 06 would be 14 across.
- Whether 10 across suits you, in that aeroplane, is your call. Go or no-go is still yours.
Basin and tablelands: the METAR map
2:24 · iPad
The METAR map before a nav from Camden to Goulburn: what the dot colours mean and what they don't, how old each report is, Camden's and Goulburn's METARs, Goulburn's TAF, and an aerodrome with no METAR of its own. Every report was VFR on the afternoon it was filmed. NOTAMs show as not checked because no NAIPS login is connected in the clip.
Transcript
- Before a nav to Goulburn. Camden's down in the basin; Goulburn's up on the tablelands, at about 2,100 feet. First, the map.
- Each dot is an aerodrome, coloured from its latest METAR. Grey means no METAR of its own, or no data.
- The colours are fixed bands of cloud base and visibility, the American flight categories. Green is no ceiling below 3,000 feet and 8 kilometres or more. Blue is under that; red and purple are lower again. This afternoon, every report is green.
- They're not the VMC table. That's in the VFR Guide, page 205, and it depends on the class of airspace and your height.
- Up top, when the feed last updated. Each station has its own observation time, and a dot doesn't change as its report gets old; the panel shows the age.
- Camden's automatic station at 02:30 Zulu: wind 100 at 7, visibility 10 kilometres or more, broken cloud at 6,900 feet, QNH 1019.
- Goulburn, same time: wind 200 at 6, 10 kilometres or more, scattered cloud at 6,000. Cloud heights are above the aerodrome, so that's about 8,100 feet above sea level.
- Lower down, the TAF as a timeline. Goulburn's has one period, to 08 Zulu, seven this evening, and it's VFR all the way.
- NOTAMs need your own NAIPS login. There isn't one on this test account, so they show as not checked.
- The Oaks has no METAR of its own. The panel borrows Camden's and says so, and the conditions at the top are the BOM's non-aviation weather.
- Map Layers. The weather overlays, cloud, rain, pressure, wind and temperature, come from OpenWeather, not from the BOM reports behind the dots.
- Cloud cover, for the broad picture. The dots are still the reports.
- The panel calls itself a planning aid, not authoritative guidance. The decision stays with you.
Risk check before the nav
1:58 · iPhone
The five-step risk check for a cross-country from Camden to Goulburn, and how the score is built from your answers and your profile. The answers were entered for the clip and nothing was saved.
Transcript
- Not much flying lately, and the plan is Camden to Goulburn. Before you commit, there's the risk check.
- Five steps. First the flight: cross-country, Camden to Goulburn.
- It fetches the current observation at each end, both VFR, and asks you whether the forecast is stable.
- Then you: sleep, hours awake, fatigue, stress. It asks you to be honest, and takes your word for it.
- The aeroplane, your fuel reserve, and whether you know it. Hours on type come from the logbook: one, in 90 days.
- Then the conditions: night, terrain, water, remote, unfamiliar. Experience comes from your profile: 251 hours, one in the last 90 days, no instrument rating.
- 23 out of 100: the low band, with the app's standard line for it. The score is a fixed scoring of your answers. No language model involved.
- Most of it is pilot experience, 17 of 20: six for low recent currency, six for no instrument rating, and five for experience and time on type.
- The aircraft section adds four for limited time on type, and the mission two, for a cross-country. That's the 23.
- NOTAMs aren't in the score. They come through your own NAIPS login, and none is connected here, so: not checked, check NAIPS.
- Then what to do about it, each with a source. For low currency: fly with an instructor or a safety pilot.
- It calls its own verdict a planning aid, not authoritative guidance. The decision stays yours. And we didn't save this one.
Taking a mate flying: weight and balance
3:04 · iPhone
Weight and balance for two people, a bag and fuel in a Cessna 150M, on a hot afternoon at Camden. It uses the app's library entry for the 150M under a placeholder registration, VH-ABC, so the figures are reference values, not a real aircraft's. The take-off figures are a labelled generic estimate and do not establish that the runway will do.
Transcript
- Taking a mate flying in a Cessna 150 on a hot afternoon. Two of you and a small bag. Can you take full fuel?
- First, the aeroplane. VH-ABC is a placeholder registration, added from the app's library entry for a Cessna 150M.
- The library's figures are reference values, and it says so: replace the empty weight and arm from your weighing record, and check every value against your POH.
- Make it the default, and open the details.
- Empty weight 509 kilos, max take-off 726, useful load 217, and the station arms. In your own aeroplane, those come from its weight and balance schedule and its POH.
- Now weight and balance, with VH-ABC selected. Departing Camden, runway 24.
- For the hot afternoon we type the weather in: 32 degrees, QNH 1012, calm. It labels that as scenario values, not an observation.
- Me at 80 kilos, my mate at 80, and a 10-kilo bag.
- Full tanks: 85 litres, at 0.72 kilos a litre.
- Outside limits. 740 kilos, 14 over max take-off weight. The centre of gravity's inside its limits. It's the weight.
- Fill only to the tabs: 44 litres. 711 kilos, within limits, 15 to spare.
- Now the take-off. Pick the handbook profile, built from the 1976 POH for the 150M.
- Outside supported handbook data. The 150M chart is published at 1,600 pounds only, 726 kilos, and the app doesn't adjust it for other weights. So at 711 kilos, no figures.
- Switch to manual values and you get a generic estimate, labelled as one: not calibrated to this aircraft. Its note says the figures are unverified, the handbook profile is limited to its named variant, and independent review is still pending.
- Take-off: 310 metres of ground roll, 581 to fifty feet, and 668 with its planning allowance, shown separately.
- Under each result: runway suitability not established. It does the sums. It doesn't tell you the runway will do.
- And the note at the bottom says it plainly: these are estimates, and checking them against the POH is the pilot in command's job.
Hot day: ask the chat to check the loading
2:56 · iPhone
The same Cessna 150M, mate and bag as the previous clip, on the same hot afternoon at Camden. This time the chat fills in the weight and balance sheet and answers. One figure in its answer, the forward CG limit, is wrong, and the clip says so: the sheet is what counts. The 32 degrees, QNH 1012 and calm wind are typed in as a scenario, and the aircraft is the placeholder VH-ABC.
Transcript
- Same 150, same mate, same bag, same hot afternoon at Camden: 32 degrees, QNH 1012, calm, typed in as a scenario.
- This time, ask the chat. It's a language model, and it can be wrong. It puts numbers on the sheet; the sheet does the sums, and the sheet is what you check.
- My mate's 80 kg and we've got a 10 kg bag. I want full fuel. Put that on the sheet and tell me if we're inside the envelope.
- It reads the aeroplane's saved settings, runs the weight and balance, and fills in the sheet: 740 kilos. Overweight by 14.
- The chat's answer agrees: no, overweight. 740.2 kilos, 14.2 over, and the CG at 0.901 metres.
- One figure in it is wrong. It gives the forward limit as 0.800 metres. That's the limit at lighter weights.
- On the sheet, the forward edge slopes back as the weight goes up: at maximum weight it's 0.836. The CG's inside either way; it's the weight that puts it outside. The sheet's envelope is what counts, not the chat's sentence.
- It suggests 65 litres instead. So we ask for the most fuel we can take and stay under max weight, and to set it.
- It sets 65 litres, and says so. The sheet: 726 kilos, within limits, margin zero.
- By its own sum it's 725.8: two tenths of a kilo under. That isn't a margin. It's right on maximum weight.
- Now the distances, from the 150M handbook table. 726 kilos is the one weight its chart is published for, and 32 degrees puts the density altitude at 2,371 feet.
- Still marked: your aeroplane's serial, engine and propeller must match that POH, and the transcription awaits independent review.
- Take-off: 260 metres of ground roll, 489 to clear fifty feet, and 562 with the planning allowance, shown separately.
- Landing, at the same weight: 145 metres of ground roll, 342 over fifty feet, 489 with its allowance. Under both: runway suitability not established.
- The heat doesn't change what you weigh. It changes how much runway you use. Check the chat against the sheet, and the sheet against your aeroplane's POH.
Three on board out of The Oaks
2:32 · iPhone
The runway calculator for a Cessna 172S on The Oaks' 900 m grass runway, with a typed-in hot-day scenario and the app's transcription of the 172S NAV III handbook, which is not yet independently reviewed. It shows the take-off distances with a planning allowance, and where it gives no figure: a landing at a weight the handbook has no chart for, and a sloping runway. It does not establish that a runway is suitable.
Transcript
- Three of us in the club's 172, out of The Oaks on a warm afternoon. Nine hundred metres of grass, 880 feet up.
- The runway calculator says it first: reference only, not for deciding whether to take off or land.
- Aircraft: the 172 from the hangar.
- Fill from the aerodrome, runway 18 right. No declared distances are held for this strip, so it takes the runway length, and says to check the ERSA.
- The weather is a typed-in scenario, not today's: 32 degrees, QNH 1008, calm.
- Take-off weight: 1,050 kilos, with three on board.
- Grass, dry and firm. The slope is ours to set, and the ERSA entry doesn't give one: zero, for this example.
- There's a handbook profile for the 172S, from the NAV III handbook. It's a transcription not yet independently reviewed, and it only fits if your aircraft matches: variant, engine, propeller, revision. Say ours does.
- Take-off: 334 metres of ground roll, and 537 to 50 feet. Grass adds 15 per cent of the ground roll; that correction is in the profile.
- With the app's 15 per cent allowance, 617 of the 900 metres. It says to check the factor your operation needs.
- It's labelled an unverified handbook calculation, not an operational clearance, and a distance comparison only. It doesn't say the runway is suitable.
- Density altitude, about 3,200 feet.
- The ERSA for The Oaks notes tall trees close to the thresholds, and soft surfaces after heavy rain. The calculator models neither obstacles nor soft ground.
- Now the landing on the way in. This handbook has one landing chart, at 1,157 kilos. At our weight it gives no figure, rather than adjust the chart.
- Back on take-off, with a one per cent upslope: the profile has no slope correction, so no figure.
- Unsupported conditions produce no distance. For the decision, it's the POH.
Goulburn's ERSA, then ask the chat
2:32 · iPad
Reading Goulburn's ERSA entry in the app's offline document library, then asking the chat about parachuting and checking its answer against the page. The chat answer is not a briefing: the clip shows it leaving something out.
Transcript
- First landing at Goulburn, this Saturday. Before you go, you read the ERSA.
- It's all on the device, and works offline: the ERSA for 754 aerodromes, the restricted and danger areas, Part 91, the VFR Guide and the AIP.
- The footer gives the editions. This is the ERSA of 3 September 2026: check it's still the current one before you rely on it.
- Search Goulburn. Its page has the facilities PDF, and the runway data on its own page.
- Page one, the remarks. Runway 04/22 isn't available on weekends to aircraft below 650 kilos, except with 60 minutes' notice to the aerodrome reporting officer. We're landing on a Saturday, so check which side of 650 kilos your aeroplane is.
- Further down: no parking on the central grassed area, because of parachuting. CTAF 127.15.
- Page two: parachuting from flight level 150 overhead, intensive on weekends, and military jumps within 25 miles. Then gliders at Towrang, 12 miles north-east, winch launching to 4,500 feet.
- You can also ask the chat. It's a language model, and here it reads the same ERSA. So you check it against the page.
- I'm landing at Goulburn on Saturday. What does the ERSA say about parachuting there?
- It cites the facilities page, effective 3 September 2026.
- It matches the page. Civil jumps from flight level 150, intensive on weekends. Military jumps within 25 miles, to flight level 250, and under a military jump NOTAM, call SNOWBIRD or the drop zone safety officer on the CTAF before start-up, or 25 miles out.
- It ends: planning aid only, the PIC is the final authority.
- But it kept to parachuting, so it left out the Towrang gliders, on the same page. The page is what counts: read all of it.
What's that area at Wilton?
1:23 · iPad
Finding out what a circle on the map is: the airspace layer, the list of areas at a point, and the document library entry for D594 Wilton. The map shows published boundaries, not whether an area is active today.
Transcript
- Training out of Camden, there's a small circle on the map just to the south, by Tahmoor. What is it?
- Map Layers: the airspace overlay, drawn from the DAH of 9 July 2026, with each type on or off.
- Tap the map, and it lists every area over that spot. Nine here: the Sydney CTA steps from 4,500 feet up, and the control areas above them.
- And at the bottom, D594 Wilton: surface to 7,500 feet.
- These are published boundaries, and the map says so: activation not shown. Whether it's active today, check the NOTAMs and the VTC.
- The document library has the details of all 579 restricted and danger areas. Search D594.
- A danger area, surface to 7,500. Hours HJ: sunrise to sunset. Parachuting, and the operator to contact.
- Those hours are when it can be active, not when it is.